Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 1,117 Karma: 99
Environmental Damage and Anchor Babies « Thread Started on Sept 21, 2009, 3:59pm »
CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight" had a segment tonight on the environmental impact of overpopulation, quoting the British medical journal, the "Lancet" and a study at Oregon State. The Brits say condoms are five times as effective as solar cells at reducing global warming.
How many babies are born in the US just to be anchors? Interpreting the 14th Amendment to eliminate anchor babies will probably have a huge environmental impact, while saving $Billions in welfare.
Just as I refused to start a family to dodge the draft in 1965, (Cheney got his wife pregnant to dodge the draft) it is reprehensible for babies to be created for the purpose of being anchors.
Joined: Aug 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 565 Karma: 42
Re: Environmental Damage and Anchor Babies « Reply #1 on Sept 22, 2009, 12:37pm »
for once we agree
speaking of the environment the sierra club gets millions and millions from Mexico, not to report on the environmental damage illegals do to border states like arizona and texas.
![[Home]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/home.gif)
![[Help]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/help.gif)
![[Search]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/search.gif)
![[Login]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/login.gif)
![[Register]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/register.gif)
![[Search This Thread]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Reply]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/reply.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Author
![[Quote]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/quote.gif)
Logged