Post by jeffolie on Jul 30, 2012 15:55:10 GMT -6
Greenhouse gases"converted" climate "skeptic"
Greenhouse gases are as much a political issue as a science issue because of the political association with Al Gore et al and Democrats as opposed to the entrenched manufacturing, transportation and electric generating industries that are impacted with higher costs to reduce the greenhouse gases.
Obama's EPA has been making rules impacting many industries based on greenhouse gases. I just did a thread on coal, miners and electrical generation plants that must close...175.
The below conversion of a Koch brothers sponsored Berkely science caught my attention. I understand his change.
Unfortunately, no examination of volcanoes impacting weather and pushing gases and particulates into the air appears in the news articles.
I am disappointed volcanoes were omitted.
===============================
Everyone's Talking About The Koch Brothers-Funded Study That Proves Climate Change Is Real
Over the weekend, UC-Berkeley professor Richard Muller outed himself as a "converted" climate "skeptic" in the New York Times after his Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project concluded the earth's surface temperature had increased 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit in the past 250 years and one and a half degrees in the past 50 years, likely entirely because of human industrial activity.
What makes this newsworthy, according to The Guardian, is that BEST had received $150,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, whose namesake also runs the climate skeptic research program The Heartland Institute.
From Muller's op-ed:
"...our record is long enough that we could search for the fingerprint of solar variability, based on the historical record of sunspots. That fingerprint is absent. Although the I.P.C.C. allowed for the possibility that variations in sunlight could have ended the “Little Ice Age,” a period of cooling from the 14th century to about 1850, our data argues strongly that the temperature rise of the past 250 years cannot be attributed to solar changes. This conclusion is, in retrospect, not too surprising; we’ve learned from satellite measurements that solar activity changes the brightness of the sun very little."
...
"How definite is the attribution to humans? The carbon dioxide curve gives a better match than anything else we’ve tried. Its magnitude is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect — extra warming from trapped heat radiation. These facts don’t prove causality and they shouldn’t end skepticism, but they raise the bar: to be considered seriously, an alternative explanation must match the data at least as well as carbon dioxide does. Adding methane, a second greenhouse gas, to our analysis doesn’t change the results.
What now? As a scientist, Muller can only cross his fingers.
"I hope that the Berkeley Earth analysis will help settle the scientific debate regarding global warming and its human causes. Then comes the difficult part: agreeing across the political and diplomatic spectrum about what can and should be done."
Read more: www.businessinsider.com/koch-brothers-funded-study-proves-climate-change-2012-7#ixzz2292LIHZ8
Greenhouse gases are as much a political issue as a science issue because of the political association with Al Gore et al and Democrats as opposed to the entrenched manufacturing, transportation and electric generating industries that are impacted with higher costs to reduce the greenhouse gases.
Obama's EPA has been making rules impacting many industries based on greenhouse gases. I just did a thread on coal, miners and electrical generation plants that must close...175.
The below conversion of a Koch brothers sponsored Berkely science caught my attention. I understand his change.
Unfortunately, no examination of volcanoes impacting weather and pushing gases and particulates into the air appears in the news articles.
I am disappointed volcanoes were omitted.
===============================
Everyone's Talking About The Koch Brothers-Funded Study That Proves Climate Change Is Real
Over the weekend, UC-Berkeley professor Richard Muller outed himself as a "converted" climate "skeptic" in the New York Times after his Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project concluded the earth's surface temperature had increased 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit in the past 250 years and one and a half degrees in the past 50 years, likely entirely because of human industrial activity.
What makes this newsworthy, according to The Guardian, is that BEST had received $150,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, whose namesake also runs the climate skeptic research program The Heartland Institute.
From Muller's op-ed:
"...our record is long enough that we could search for the fingerprint of solar variability, based on the historical record of sunspots. That fingerprint is absent. Although the I.P.C.C. allowed for the possibility that variations in sunlight could have ended the “Little Ice Age,” a period of cooling from the 14th century to about 1850, our data argues strongly that the temperature rise of the past 250 years cannot be attributed to solar changes. This conclusion is, in retrospect, not too surprising; we’ve learned from satellite measurements that solar activity changes the brightness of the sun very little."
...
"How definite is the attribution to humans? The carbon dioxide curve gives a better match than anything else we’ve tried. Its magnitude is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect — extra warming from trapped heat radiation. These facts don’t prove causality and they shouldn’t end skepticism, but they raise the bar: to be considered seriously, an alternative explanation must match the data at least as well as carbon dioxide does. Adding methane, a second greenhouse gas, to our analysis doesn’t change the results.
What now? As a scientist, Muller can only cross his fingers.
"I hope that the Berkeley Earth analysis will help settle the scientific debate regarding global warming and its human causes. Then comes the difficult part: agreeing across the political and diplomatic spectrum about what can and should be done."
Read more: www.businessinsider.com/koch-brothers-funded-study-proves-climate-change-2012-7#ixzz2292LIHZ8