|
Post by nomad943 on Jan 10, 2008 16:23:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by blueneck on Jan 10, 2008 19:11:14 GMT -6
who?
|
|
|
Post by nomad943 on Jan 10, 2008 23:13:32 GMT -6
Albert Howard. He was one of the "other" candidates that appeared on the NH republican primary ballot. As such it is his right to ask for a recount and he came in from Michigan to do so. You know how if a certain candidate were to ask for a recount it might envigorate his detractors by encouraging them to rail on about conspiracy theorists...... Not like it would be something our masters would do would be to tinker with an election. Those opti scan boxes are there to make everything more SECURE Still, something was mighty strange about that count, probably significantly on the democrat side, but even the GOP count was plain wierd. Do you know that 5% of McCains vote came from people who strongly dissaproved of him? They put in those stupid scanners statewide so who knows what actualy happened. See prison planet or Bev Harris's BBV site for complete details.
|
|
|
Post by unlawflcombatnt on Jan 11, 2008 3:49:16 GMT -6
We need to return to 100% paper ballots. Compared to the current system, there were relatively few problems. And it's always possible to go back and recount the votes.
In Federal elections, this should be mandatory. Congress should put this right at the top of their "things-to-do" list and pass legislation mandating this. In a Federal election, this is not the jurisdiction of the states. It's under the jurisdiction of Congress and the Federal government.
|
|
|
Post by graybeard on Jan 11, 2008 7:18:19 GMT -6
Election fraud is as plausible as any other reason given for Hillary's win. Heard on the tube this morning that she didn't even have an acceptance speech written, just a concession speech. McCain read his speech off a napkin, or something. It was flat. The results did not match reality.
Maybe Hillary's flirting with Rupert Murdoch last year brought some Rovian help.
When you consider how rarely they are used, voting machines have to be some of the poorest investments even our government has ever made. Farmer's learned many years ago that a $150 thousand combine they used only two weeks a year was a bad investment. Some learned it only after bankruptcy.
Teams of people have to train poll workers to use the machines, and they have roving troubleshooters on election days, spare machines, itec., and some of the volunteer poll workers are even encouraged to take their machines home before the elections. These things are made for fraud.
GB
|
|
|
Post by nomad943 on Jan 11, 2008 14:28:04 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by nomad943 on Jan 13, 2008 20:27:18 GMT -6
|
|