|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 15, 2011 7:57:14 GMT -6
I just can't see education being a driver of inflation. It's a minor government regulated service industry in the big scheme of things.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 14, 2011 2:34:19 GMT -6
How about culturally-programmed for violence. So what'll happen if there are regional food shortages in white communities or people there don't have any money for food? Will they all sing along or fight everyone else for food? You mean like what happened to France, Spain, and Germany in WW1, WW2?
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 13, 2011 16:13:46 GMT -6
There is a difference between voting NO on Free Trade Agreements and wanting to bring the Tariff back, like Ron Paul and the link I have in my signature below every post I make:
Translation: Ron Paul would maintain ultra-low tariffs, and other trade barriers, eliminate them altogether while SIMULTANEOUSLY removing US from Free Trade Treaties. That would be a disaster.
"What does this have to do with Bernie Sanders?" Good question. Does Bernie Sanders specifically say he will raise Tariffs? No, in fact I can't find anything on the internet linking the keywords "Bernie Sanders" with "Tariff" except when dealing with Ethanol.
Bernie Sanders is a leftist version of Ron Paul, and they are all Globalists. Bernie Sanders WILL NOT raise Tariffs except on maybe a few small vote getting schemes for the idiot Greens or some few key industry constituencies.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 13, 2011 15:48:45 GMT -6
Teddy and Ike didn't vote for funding abortion and gay marriage, discrimination against whites, taking away guns, TARP, voting yes on every spending program you can imagine except military (that part about military sounds distinctly anti IKE/TEDDY).
You're joking right? I love abortion and gay marriage issues. Most GOPers can't see these as the hot button wedge issues they are. GOPers go stupid and mean when they are brought up and forget about the fact that GOP is economically dismantling the country and wiping out the white middle-class. But all the GOPtard can see is gays molesting him and women getting abortions. Even when the dumb shit loses his job to off-shoring, he doesn't make the connection between supporting a anti-labor, anti-American GOP politician and his job loss. And your precious GOP is as anti-white as the Demos. The GOP is the first to support trade deals that are often UnConstitutional and pure poison to our workers - especially whites in the industrial and tech sectors where they form the majority. They refuse to secure our borders and stop illegal immigration and punish employers who hire them, they refuse to stop the importation of H1-B visa workers. You can't honestly call the GOP pro-white at all when they support such a agenda. The fuckers are just as globalist as Bill Clinton and Obama are. They're just better at playing the white voter than the Dems. The rank and file GOPers never get they are just porch monkeys or "useful idiots" as the commies like to call this sort of person. And oh, Teddy and Ike would have never supported the illegal Iraq war and blowing $4 trillion dollars on it and Afghanistan during a time of economic hardship. And fighting 4 other LICs(Pakistan, Yemen, Kenya and Libya). And paying a trillion dollars on two useless fighter jets. Neither would they have tolerated the GOP killing Glass-Stegall(which created the real-estate bubble and TARP) and promoting illegal and unConstitutional trade agreement. Nor would they've supported the PATRIOT Act or something as monsterous as the TSA. I could go on, but the GOP is pretty much a obscenity as it stands. They make Sanders look like a saint. So you hate the GOP, so your solution is to vote Democrat. Well here you go: Just as long as you vote based on hatred, you'll always come out smelling like roses. And you must be joking about T Roosevelt and Eisenhower. Geez. Roosevelt personally commanded the expedition to invade Cuba, the avatar of aggressive foreign policy; and Eisenhower the Supreme Allied Commander in WW2. right.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 13, 2011 15:45:01 GMT -6
Cerial, what's the point? You get more pay, but the new taxes you pay negate that extra pay, what's the point again? You're kidding, right? Sanders doesn't support raising taxes on anyone but the wealthiest Americans, who are sending their money overseas in the first place to create jobs in China. He advocates increasing taxes on hedge fund managers and investors who are not increasing this nations wealth at all. Rather, they're extracting what wealth remains, and decreasing wealth production in the process. I'd tax the tax the uber-wealthy at over 75%, if it were up to me. Capital gains taxes would be 50%, not the 10 or 15% they currently are. You don't pay any tax on money you re-invest. You deduct that amount. You pay taxes on the money you make when you sell off your assets. It doesn't help the country in the slightest to make such sales easier. In fact, it hurts it tremendously when the sale of capital assets becomes more profitable through tax reductions. The rich can easily afford to pay more, and taxing them at higher rates doesn't reduce their investment in US industry or job creation in the slightest. The richest multinationals are spending all of their tax breaks on lobbying Congress for anti-labor legislation, more tax cuts, and to facilitate their ability to invest overseas and sell their products back into the US market. The Uber-wealthy would just wait it out. Even if Bernie Sanders were made Dictator for life so the top 1% couldn't wait it out, those taxes on the top 1% still wouldn't cover the current deficit+Bernie Sanders new spending. Top 1% owning 38% of wealth is the phrase tossed around but wealth=assets, not income, and these days most of those assets are on foreign soil meaning there is probably no jurisdiction to tax their assets (property). The only way to really tax their ass is with a Tariff, taxing the profits made off of their foreign assets, so unless Bernie Sander's is talking Tariffs then he's talking out of his ass.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 13, 2011 15:16:49 GMT -6
There are only 6 billion humanoids on the planet, 1 trillion is like allot more.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 13, 2011 15:12:45 GMT -6
I don't watch much TV, but spent the last 2 weeks watching seasons 1,2,3 of Breaking Bad. WOW! Great TV show.
(slimy lawyer)
Season 4 starts this Monday.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 21:11:29 GMT -6
www.ontheissues.org/senate/barack_obama.htmBarrack Obama: Wow, he's really going to put his foot down. Nooooo. You have to look specifically for a word called "Tariff", when the candidates campaign does the candidate specifically use the word "Tariff" in the context of RAISING THE TARIFF, and use it often. If not, then prepared to be taken for another ride like the suckers the American people are. Don't worry, the entertainment media will point to any pro-tariff candidate just like a compass always points north, cause they are seen to be very radical and entertaining: Trump, Buchanan, Perot.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:36:13 GMT -6
Soon Facebook will have a TRILLION users Really, when will that happen.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:32:57 GMT -6
I watched a Nova program on energy the other night. There is no single answer to energy needs. We have to use solar, NG, wind, etc., to their maximum advantage. NG works real good as filler when other sources aren't doing it. Conservation is just as important as any source of energy. GB Conservation isn't a source of energy, it's called living poor.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:32:04 GMT -6
lawl
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:30:11 GMT -6
Cerial, what's the point?
You get more pay, but the new taxes you pay negate that extra pay, what's the point again?
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:29:12 GMT -6
He's about the only one who has consistently stood against globalization. Globalization: Free Trade and Open Borders. Bernie Sanders is an Open Borders candidate, that half must have slipped your mind.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:25:38 GMT -6
Teddy and Ike are seen by most Republicans today as "socialists". Neither could get elected to city council today. Teddy and Ike didn't vote for funding abortion and gay marriage, discrimination against whites, taking away guns, TARP, voting yes on every spending program you can imagine except military (that part about military sounds distinctly anti IKE/TEDDY). I mean let's get cerial, geez.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 12, 2011 20:24:40 GMT -6
" Voted NO on promoting free trade with Peru. (Dec 2007) Voted NO on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade. (Jul 2005) Voted NO on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement. (Jul 2004) Voted NO on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement. (Jul 2003) Voted NO on implementing free trade agreement with Chile. (Jul 2003) Voted YES on withdrawing from the WTO. (Jun 2000) Voted NO on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements. (Sep 1998).... No MFN for China; condition trade on human rights. (Nov 1999) " Sounds like a true anti-globalist Populist to me. So. There's more to trade policy than voting on FTA's, like raising/lowering Tariffs. * Rated 33% by CATO, indicating a mixed record on trade issues. (Dec 2002) And what use are jobs when your taxes are at 75% cause he votes yes on every socialist program you can imagine.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:39:48 GMT -6
I don't take sleeping pills (downers). I found it's better to just not get sleep then to have a sleeping pill hangover the next day.
I've always had trouble getting to sleep, but I blame that on my father.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:33:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:24:52 GMT -6
What the article says:72% want "Free Markets", Democrats remain on defensive Republicans dominate voters hearts & minds Voters swept Republicans into office to dominate the House with many zealots against debt/deficits. Today, voters remain dominated by thinking the incumbents have failed and 'free markets' should remove regulations. Republicans are not getting many to register as Republicans even as Republicans win the elections. Voters now are identifying themselves as 'not affiliated' with any established political party. No matter, these independents vote against Democrats giving Republicans victories. Today's "...72% Favor Free Market Economy Over One Managed by the Government..." means Democrats remain today on the defensive. Lobbyists must be dancing in the streets as this political atmosphere supports corporations efforts to lower, restrict, remove government oversight. ============================================== 72% Favor Free Market Economy Over One Managed by the Government Voters remain strongly supportive of a free market economy over one controlled by the government and still think small businesses are hurt more than big businesses when the government does get involved. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 72% of Likely U.S. Voters believe a free market economy is better than an economy managed by the government. Just 14% think a government-managed economy is better. Another 14% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here). Republicans and unaffiliated voters overwhelmingly prefer a free market approach. Among these segments of the electorate, the number preferring a government-managed economy is in the single digits. Among Democrats, 48% say a free market is better, but 29% think a government-managed economy is the answer. Twenty-three percent (23%) are not sure. Seventy-five percent (75%) of those who work for a private company give the nod to a free market economy, compared to 53% of government employees. The majority (56%) of all voters think increased competition rather than increased government regulation is the best way to hold big business accountable. But 34% see increased regulation as the better course. Voters also view increased competition rather than increased government regulation as a better way to protect borrowers from unfair lending practices. www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... government What the neocons hear: More FTA's.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:23:14 GMT -6
My definition of "terrorist" is an ideology being pushed by using violence and/or vulgar propaganda that isn't accepted by at least 33% of the populace.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:20:39 GMT -6
"Even medium sized towns with a large Hispanic or Black populace" What makes you say that? Blacks and Hispanics are somehow programmed for violence? What about poor white populations? How about culturally-programmed for violence.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 11, 2011 22:19:41 GMT -6
Default, currency devaluation, raise debt ceiling; the negative effects are going to quantitatively be the same.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 19:30:15 GMT -6
People like Bloomberg are the source of the problem in regards to immigration in this country and in Europe. Now he's no dummy like that jackass mayor of LA who also supports unlimited immigration albeit for different reasons. Bloomberg like a lot of his kind really don't like the white middle and working class and would like to see them marginalized or gone. It's the same with the Democratic party, the ACLU, SPLC even the Sierra Club. They are all supporters of unlimited immigration and open borders. They desire in essence the economic destruction of the white middle and working class along with the obliteration of idea of American culture and assimilation and replacing it with race based tribalism and balkanization. And yeah more people the better. That way companies have a infinite supply of low wage workers to use and abuse and no worry of rebellion. Even the major newspapers susch as the NYT and LAT support unlimited immigration. And of course both are owned by billionaires cut from the same cloth as Bloomberg. The Sierra Club is for unlimited immigration? That environmental organization called the Sierra Club? You know when the Green-Terrorists say something like, "Americans consume 20% of the world's natural resources yet are only 1/20th the world's population," nobody ever denies that statistic. Even Rush Limbaugh will shake his head and go, "Yeah that's what we call Progress on the right," cause it is progress. Real Progress for Real Progressives. Double the US population and it will be, "America consumes 40% of the world's natural resources yet are only 1/10th of the world's population." Double it again, "America consumes 80% of the world's natural resources yet are only 1/5th of the world's population." Obviously this is unsustainable, even a Green Terrorist group like the Sierra Club should see that.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 10:49:40 GMT -6
All immigration needs to be stopped, dot dot dot. Do you guys want to live in a country with the population density of China?
The US and China have similar land area, similar percentage of desertification, similar percentage of mountains; but China has 4X the population. In 50 years that could easily be 2X. And 100 years from that we could have the same population density.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 8:09:05 GMT -6
Not my favorite.
She's a McCain clone with boobs. Said that in 2008 and nobody believed me.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 8:08:03 GMT -6
No carpool lane for hybrid drivers Solo drivers of hybrid vehicles with yellow Clean Air decals can no longer use carpool lanes. Plug-in hybrids and vehicles with hydrogen internal combustion engines will be issued a green Clean Air decal effective next year. Zero-emission vehicles with a white Clean Air sticker may continue to use the carpool lane until Jan. 1, 2015. I like this law. <---evil grin
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 8:01:08 GMT -6
Sorry what's happened to you unlawful... and the breaker just kicked off again. *sigh*
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 7:58:24 GMT -6
Buying a gun--especially a rifle--is an excellent idea. Take it to a range and make sure you can fire it. And make sure the rifle itself actually works. (The 1st rifle I ever owned actually blew up in my face.) I didn't need to know that, one of those too much information things. Anticipating something bad is what ruins your aim.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 7:57:02 GMT -6
I don't think it really matters what happens, which road taken; it's gonna hurt either way.
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 10, 2011 7:55:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by fredorbob on Jul 9, 2011 21:18:04 GMT -6
Photovoltaics are toys people have in their man-cave, not utilities.
|
|